In this Essay (Part 2), we will explore one of the most salient factors that increases our ability to rationalize a dishonest act, and how we can combat this force in order to maintain our integrity.
The Psychological Distance Between the Deed and the Consequence
A key factor that significantly influences our ability to rationalize a dishonest act is the psychological distancebetween the act and its consequences. The more steps removed we are from how an immoral decision affects others and from having to think about the reality of what we’re doing, the easier it is to make the choice without feeling bad about it.
Research conducted by Israeli-American professor of psychology and behavioural economics and author, Dan Ariely found that many people wouldn’t think twice about taking a ream of paper from work, but wouldn’t dream of grabbing $3.50 from the office’s petty cash box, even though the value of the cash is roughly the same as the value of the paper.
How to Counteract the Psychological Distance and Strengthen Your Integrity
The greater the psychological distancebetween our dishonest actions and their consequences,the easier those actions become to rationalize as morally and ethically acceptable. And the more our ability to rationalize increases, the more our fudge factor margin widens. Thus, in order to strengthen and preserve our integrity, it’s important to remove the steps – if only in our minds – between our actions and the reality of what we’re doing and how it affects others.
Cultivating this awareness really comes down to cognitively stripping away the layers between something and its value or effect on other people, for example, if you’re about to take some printer ink from work, imagine yourself instead taking $30 from your boss’s desk drawer. If you can’t see yourself pilfering the cash, realize that swiping the ink is really no different.
The essence of integrity is that an action is wrong regardless of its magnitude – stealing ten dollars from a rich man isn’t more okay than stealing ten dollars from a poor man. It doesn’t matter that the former wouldn’t “feel” it like the latter. Stealing is stealing.
Conclusion
We should always remember that we’re all experts in creating rationalizations for dishonest behaviour when that behaviour serves our own interests. And the greater the distance there is between an immoral act and its consequences, the easier it becomes to generate these rationalizations.
Thus, living with integrity requires frank and sincere self-examination and self-awareness.
What are your true motivations and intentions?
What are the consequences of your actions and whom will they affect?
Strengthening your mental game and building this kind of awareness isn’t easy. It involves tuning into that nagging voice in your mind, conscience and spirit that says, “Hold on a minute, this isn’t quite right”.
Winning themental battle is the first step in being a person with impeccable integrity.
Did you know that around 45% of everything we do on a daily basis is habitual?
We all have habits. We have some great habits that have stood us in good stead and that we certainly would not want to change. We also have bad habits that we wish we didn’t have, but are unsure how to change or remove the unwanted ones. The good news is that unwanted habits can be broken.
In this Article we will help you understand why habits are at the core of everything you do, how you can change them, how to develop new habits and how long it takes.
Charles Duhigg, the Author of the Bestseller “The Power of Habit” (which is generally regarded as the most authoritative source on the topic of Habits) says “Once you understand that habits can change, you have the freedom and the responsibility to remake them.”
What is a “Habit”?
A “habit” is one’s customary way of doing things; routine behaviours displayed on a regular basis (often unconscious patterns of behaviour) that are acquired through frequent repetition.
According to Duhigg, habits are actions that people decide to do intentionally and continue subconsciously.He also describes a habit as an activity that a person intentionally decides to perform once and continues doing without having to focus on it anymore because it performs with a certain frequency.
“Our character is basically a composite of our habits. Because they are consistent, often unconscious patterns, they constantly, daily,
express our character.”– Stephen R. Covey, Leadership Expert and Author
“Habit is the intersection of knowledge (what to do), skill (how to do), and desire (want to do).” – Stephen R. Covey
“In essence, if we want to direct our lives, we must take control of our consistent actions. It’s not what we do once in a while that shapes our lives, but what we do consistently.” – Tony Robbins, Author and Motivational Speaker
“Depending on what they are, our habits will either make us or break us. We become what we repeatedly do.”― Sean Covey, Business Executive, Author and Speaker
We are all characterized by what we do (and not do), what we say (and not say) and how we do and say things. In my experience, what and how we think coupled with what we say and do, probably has the most dramatic impact on most aspects of our lives.
Lao Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher and writer said the following: “Watch your thoughts, they become your words; Watch your words, they become your actions; Watch your actions, they become your habits; Watch your habits, they become your character; Watch your character, it becomes your destiny.”
Our habits, including our habitual way of thinking, play a key role in our successes and failures in life as well as the extent of our inner joy, peace and contentment, our physical health, our mental health, our finances, our role as a spouse, a parent, a grandparent, or a friend and our effectiveness and productivity at work. All of us have habits that have a profound impact (positive and negative) on our life.
It is essential to realize that we are not helpless victims of our habits. The question is what are your current habits compared to what you would like your habits to be. We should not blame our past, our parents and our circumstances for our habits. Each one of us has a CHOICE how to live our lives and by implication, we can CHOOSE our habits. We should look at ourselves in the mirror and decide whether there is a need to change some of our habits, and if so, what are we going to do about it? You can become what you desire to be.
“Feeling sorry for yourself, and your present condition is not only a waste of energy but the worst habit you could possibly have.” – Dale Carnegie
Remember that Duhigg says that people can change their bad habits if they learn how the habits work.
Why do we have Habits?
Habits arise because the brain constantly looks for ways to save effort. This is because habits decrease the effort to which our minds are subjected to at the moment when we perform a certain task.An example of this is learning to drive. At first it may seem difficult, but over time, the routine becomes automatic, i.e. it requires less mental effort. Therefore, the habits that allow you to operate on autopilot are super-important. Brain activity is much lower when executing the routine part of the habit loop(this concept is dealt with lower down). Duhigg refers to “Chunking”which is the brain’s process of converting a sequence of actions into an automatic routine that allows our brains to save energy and size for other things, i.e. they free your mind and energy for new situations and new problems that require new decisions, creativity and actions.
All habits have a function. Mindless eating could be a way to comfort yourself when you’re feeling down. Cruising the Internet for hours might be a way to avoid interacting with your spouse or kids. Smoking (in addition to being addictive) may be a way to take time out to pause and think. Drinking too much may be the only way you know how to be social. If you want to break the habit, you have to come to grips with whatever function the bad habit is serving.
Samuel Johnson, Author and Poet said “The chains of habit are too weak to be felt … until they are too strong to be broken.”
How Habits are Formed
Benjamin Franklin, a previous American President, said “It’s easier to prevent bad habits than to break them.”
“We are our own potters; for our habits make us, and we make our habits”. – Frederick Langbridge, Author and Poet.
According to Duhigg, the habit process, which he calls the “Habit Loop”, consists of a three-phase loop, i.e. the cue, routine and reward:
The cue is the trigger that causes the habit to occur in the first place, i.e. it is a stimulus that sends your brain into automatic mode, and indicates which habit it should use.
The routine isthe behaviour itselfthat can be physical, mental, or emotional.
The reward,which helps your brain to know whether it is worth memorizing this specific loop for the future.
When the cue and reward connect, the brain develops a strong sense of expectation, leading to a desire and the birth of a habit.
Habit loops eventually form a craving, i.e. the anticipation of a reward. Habitual exercisers crave the “good feeling” after a workout, or another specific reward, or are envisioning a result.
Unfortunately, the brain does not judge whether the new habit is beneficial or harmful, so bad habits are also ingrained.However,
you can change destructive habits and adopt new and positive ones by understanding and managing the information retrieval cycle. Focus on your cues and rewards and change your routine to thwart the desire.
For most people, habits are hard to change. We need most of the habits we have. We go through most of our days engaging in good habits, routines and activities. If we didn’t, everything we did every day would be something we’d have to think about. Instead, we’re wired to learn and put in place activities that sustain us without giving it a moment’s thought. Once a routine is sorted into the “automatic” category, it’s hard to get out of it.
Understanding how your habits fit into these loop stages can help you change them.
Duhigg discovered that at the root of all habits, like drinking your coffee every morning, lies a simple 3-part loop.
The cue is what triggers you to do the habit, for example sitting down at your kitchen table to have breakfast every morning at say 7 a.m.
The routineis the behaviour you then automatically engage in, which, for drinking coffee, might be to go over to your coffeemaker, turn it on, and press the “large cup” button.
Lastly, you’ll receive a reward for completing the routine, such as the rich smell of your coffee, it’s hearty taste and getting to watch the steam rise from the cup as it sits on your kitchen table in the sunlight.
Your brain’s activity only spikes twice during this loop. At the beginning, to figure out which habit to engage in, and at the end, when the link between cue and routine is reinforced.
How can Habits be Changed and New Habits be Developed?
“A habit cannot be tossed out the window; it must be coaxed down the stairs a step at a time.”– Mark Twain
“You’ll never change your life until you change something you do daily. The secret of your success is found in your daily routine.”– John C. Maxwell
Correcting habits is difficult because they satisfy desires. Changing fundamental habits can drive new good behaviours or change bad ones.
Duhigg points out that people tend to think habitual behaviours like addiction can be stopped through punishment, when they’re really driven by reward. He refers to the “The Golden Rule” of habit change that states that if you use the same cue and offer the same reward, it is possible to change the routine and thereby change or replace the habit.You can change your habits by substituting just one part of the loop, i.e. the routine. The core of the Golden Rule is that a habit can be changed by changing the routine, and leave everything else intact.
Duhigg presents habits as the key to exercising regularly, losing weight, educating children well, becoming a more productive person, creating revolutionary companies, and being successful.
Smokers have a cigarette cue and a rush reward – replacements for the routine can include nicotine gum, caffeine, or other things. This can be used for small behavioural tics – such as nail biting – as well as large problems like addiction.
It is important to highlight that, although the process of changing habits is easy to expose, it does not mean that it is simple to perform. Real change requires dedication and self-understanding of what encourages your habit. No-one will stop smoking because they know their own loop, but understanding it will provide ways to plan how to change their behaviour.
Remember that if you can recognize cues and rewards, you will be able to change the routine.
Some of the major steps covered in the summary of the book “The Power of Habit” that will help in changing current habits or developing new ones are outlined below:
Isolate the cue: as soon as you feel the urge to do what you want, instantly write down 5 things: the place, the time, the emotional state, which people are close to you, and what was the preceding action that was taken. Do this a few times, observe what is repeated, and then you have the cue (trigger);
Identify the routine: discover the routine that surrounds that habit;
Experiment with rewards: find out what reward that habit seeks to achieve. Test different things to find out if the feeling you are experiencing is the same as that habit;
Duhigg explained as follows how he changed his cookie habit:
I had this bad cookie habit where in the afternoon, I would get a chocolate chip cookie in the cafeteria. As I talked to the scientists, I would ask them, How should I change this?
Well, first you need to define the cue and the reward to change the behavior. Most cues fall into one of five buckets: a time, a place, a certain emotional state, the presence of other people or a preceding action.
What I did for a couple of days was every time I felt the cookie urge, I wrote those five things down. It became clear that I was cued by certain time of day, around 3:15 to 3:45 and then I needed to figure out the reward.
It’s easy to say it was the cookie itself, but I ran experiments. One time I took a walk around the block. Or instead of the cookie, I’d have an apple or a cup of water. But each time, I would talk to my colleagues and I would socialize, and then … it became clear that it was the socializing and not the cookie that really was important. As long as I socialized, the cookie urge would go away and if I didn’t socialize, it didn’t matter what I ate.
So now I look around for someone to go and gossip with and I do that for 10 minutes and I don’t have the cookie urge anymore.
Have a plan: once the cue and routine have been identified and the reward has been selected, have an action plan (preferably in writing) to break the loop related to the given habit. Even if it seems difficult, insist until this plan becomes your new habit and you start to carry it out automatically.
Get yourself a buddy: There’s a reason that many recovery programs include group meetings and individual sponsors or therapists. Being accountable to others is a powerful incentive to persevere. By both giving and receiving support, you keep the goal in focus. Being accountable to a friend (in person or virtual) helps you to stay on track.
There is no magic formula that will automatically change your habits, but with time and effort, habits can be shaped.
With willpower (coupled with self-control) and belief, people can change their habits if they can examine and analyze them to uncover understandable clues, routines, and rewards.
Not all habits are created equal and Duhigg sayswillpower is by far one of the most important ones, as it helps us do better in all aspects of life. The Habit of willpowercan be strengthened incrementally over time with the following 3 things:
Do something that requires willpower and self-control. Start applying the principle of delaying gratification with easy, ordinary things, for example when you feel like having chocolate or coffee now, you decide to delay it for say an hour or until you have finished a task. Celebrate the small wins. Gradually increase the application of delayed gratification throughout your day in other areas. By doing this, you will strengthen your willpower and self-discipline to enable you to embark upon more challenging habits such as a tough wake-up routine or strict diet.
Preserve your autonomy (personal responsibility). Preserve and protect your autonomy by taking personal responsibility for decisions, choices, actions and behaviour wherever possible, without waiting on instructions from others. When you relinquish personal responsibility, your willpower also goes down the drain.
Plan ahead for worst-case scenarios. Wherever possible, plan ahead for worst-case scenarios, before it happens. Doing so, you will have a much better chance of controlling your emotions and feelings and dealing wisely with the situation. One example could be to think how you would react if your boss yells at you at you before it ever happens – this will help you not lose your cool when he does.
This will assist you to develop great willpower and self-control in the long run!
How long does it take to break a habit or create a new one?
According to Duhigg, the time it takes to break or create a habit differs from pattern to pattern. If it’s something like eating chocolate, you can probably develop one in 5 to 7 minutes. Things we really enjoy are usually easy to establish as habits, whereas something like exercising takes a bit longer. There’s no hard and fast rule. But there is one rule: a habit has to deliver a reward that you actually enjoy.
We know from studies that the best way to develop an exercise habit is during the first week or two, give yourself a piece of chocolate or some other treat that you really enjoy right afterwards because you have to teach your brain to enjoy exercise for exercise’s sake.
Brian Tracy says that the time period to break or create a habit can be any length from a single second to several years. The speed of new habit pattern development is largely determined by the intensity of the emotionthat accompanies the decision to begin acting in a particular way.
Many people think, talk about, and resolve to lose weight and become physically fit. This may go on for years. Then one day, the doctor says “If you don’t get your weight down and improve your physical condition, you’re in danger of dying at an early age.”
Suddenly, the thought of dying can be so intense or frightening that the individual immediately changes his diet, begins exercising, stops smoking, and becomes a healthy and fit person. Psychologists refer to this as a “significant emotional experience.”Any experience of intense joy or pain, combined with a behaviour, can create a habitual behaviour pattern that may endure for the rest of a person’s life.
Putting your hand on a hot stove or touching a live electrical wire will give you an intense and immediate pain or shock. The experience may only take a split second. But for the rest of your life, you will have developed the habit of not putting your hand on hot stoves, or touching live electrical wires. The habit will have been formed instantly, and endure permanently.
The “rule of thumb” seems to be that it tends to take approximately 28 days to break or form a habit pattern of medium complexity.Habits which are more complex or difficult to incorporate with your lifestyle may take much longer. Therefore, don’t be too hard on yourself, allow for slips and give yourself enough time.
General observation
Duhigg says “I think the thing that most surprised me was just how malleable habits are, that what we’ve learned in the last 15 years from neuroscience and psychology is that at nearly any point someone’s habits can change.
There used to be this sense that habits are locked in at the age of 25. We now know that that’s not true.If you take this approach, you can change any behaviour. It’s true that people become more comfortable in their behaviour as they get older. They have less desire to change. But it’s a matter of taking apart the behaviour and understanding the habit loop and then anything can change.”
“Successful people aren’t born that way. They become successful by establishing the habit of doing things unsuccessful people don’t like to do.”– William Makepeace Thackeray, Author and Novelist
Some of the content of this Article was derived from the following sources:
The Power of Habit – Charles Duhigg – Summary – PocketCast
Kindness is the quality of being friendly, generous, and considerate.
Kindness is a choice which can be cultivated. It is a character issue and tends to flow from what is already going on in your inner self. If you have a victim mentality, then the extent of your kindness will depend largely on what is going on around you, i.e. the circumstances. The healthy and mature approach is to be kind irrespective of the circumstances, because it is part and parcel of who you are.
That does not mean that one should not be assertive or that one should be a pushover, or to accommodate things like poor service. If kindness is dependent on circumstance, our behaviour will be erratic and unpredictable which results in people who trust in and depend on us, becoming unsettled and confused, not knowing what to expect next.
Ideally, we should take responsibility for ourselves and make kindness (instead of rudeness) towards ourselves and others, the preferred way of interacting. When this happens, people will tend to feel safe with us and will tend to trust us, resulting in us being able to be a calming influence and playing the role of peacemakers rather than creating storms, turmoil and conflict.
It sometimes becomes necessary in certain instances, to be “cruel to be kind”, e.g. to honestly convey an uncomfortable fact to someone that will be to the benefit of the person concerned. It might for example assist the individual to view something in a different light or to start doing certain things differently. The manner in which this is done is essential and the ideal would be to convey the message in a kind and caring way without beating about the bush.
Kindness is often most effective when someone is taught how to fish, rather than giving the person a fish.
You are encouraged to Subscribe free of charge to receive our Weekly Digest which informs you of the new material that has been added for the week.
Soon after Stephen R. Covey’s Book “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” was launched in the early 1990’s I bought and read it. I found it fascinating and was fortunate to apply many of the principles contained in the book in my business career and in my personal life. The book is still on my bookshelf and when I paged through it recently, I noticed all my underlining and marking of key principles throughout the book. I then decided to go through the book again and to prepare a Summary to be posted on this website. My decision was based on the excellence of the content of the book and my belief that all of Covey’s principles and the 7 habits that are required to be highly effective and successful, remain as relevant today as they were then. I trust that you will find my Summary useful and that you will enjoy putting the principles and the 7 habits into practice, without having to read the whole book.
Covey believes that the way we see the world is based on our own unique perceptions. In order to create change, we often have to change ourselves first and this can only be done by changing our paradigms/perceptions.
An important starting point is to define success.
Covey states that “In more than 25 years of working in business, university, and marriage and family settings, I have come in contact with many individuals who have achieved an incredible degree of outward success, but have found themselves struggling with an inner hunger, a deep need for personal congruency and effectiveness and for healthy, growing relationships with other people.”
He studied over 200 years of writings about what “success” means and summarised below is his description of how the definition of success has changed over the years.
During the first 150 years, the focus was on “Character Ethic”, i.e. things like integrity, humility, fidelity, temperament, courage, justice, patience, simplicity, modesty, etc. According to the Character Ethic, there are basic principles of effective living, and that people can only experience true success and happiness when they integrate these principles into their basic character.
Soon after World War 1, the view of success shifted from Character Ethic to “Personality Ethic”. Success became a function of personality, public image, attitudes and behaviours, skills and techniques. There were two paths; the one was human and public relations techniques and the other was positive mental attitude. Some of the literature acknowledged that character as an ingredient of success, but tended to compartmentalize it rather than recognise it as foundational.
Covey and his wife’s experiences with raising their son, coupled with his studies about perceptions and success, helped him to realise that there is a vital difference between Personality Ethic and Character Ethic. He found that elements of the Personality Ethic such as personal growth, communication skills and positive thinking are sometimes essential for success. However, these are secondary, not primary traits. Secondary traits alone have no permanent role in long-term relationships. Eventually, when there isn’t deep integrity and fundamental character strength, the challenges of life will cause true motives to surface and human relationship failure will replace short-term success. Covey says that in the final analysis, what we are, communicates far more eloquently than anything we say or do. We all know it. There are people we trust absolutely, because we know their character. Whether they are eloquent or not, we trust them, whether they have human relations techniques or not, we trust them, and work successfully with them. In the words of William George Jordan, “Into the hands of every individual is given a marvellous power for good or evil – the silent, unconscious, unseen influence of his life. This is simply the constant radiation of what man really is, not what he pretends to be.”
The 7 Habits that Covey proposes are:
Be Proactive
Begin with the End in Mind
Put First Things First
Think Win/Win
Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood
Synergize
Sharpen the Saw
I strongly recommend that you don’t skip Sections 2 to 6 of the Summary in order to quickly get to the details of the 7 Habits that are dealt with from Section 7 onwards. It is absolutely essential to read Sections 1 to 6, because what Covey covers in these Sections are key building blocks for properly understanding the 7 Habits. Unless you read it thoroughly, it will be difficult to understand some of the concepts, principles and terminology that are used later on in Section 7 onwards.
Please note that the vast majority of the text that is included in my Summary, has been taken verbatim from Covey’s book. This means that virtually wherever I use the term “I” it will be verbatim the wording that was used by Covey in his book.
The Power of a Paradigm
The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People embody many of the fundamental principles of human effectiveness. These habits are basic; they are primary. They represent the internalization of correct principles upon which enduring happiness and success are based. But before we can really understand these Seven Habits, we need to understand our own “paradigms” and how to make a “paradigm shift”.
Both Character Ethic and Personality Ethic are examples of social paradigms. A paradigm is a model, theory, perception, assumption, or frame of reference. In the more general sense, it’s the way we “see” the world – not in terms of our visual sense of sight, but in terms of perceiving, understanding and interpreting.
Each of us has many maps in our head which can be divided into two main categories: Maps of the way things are, or realities, and maps of the way things should be, or values. We interpret everything we experience through these mental maps.
Two people can see the same thing, disagree, and both be right. It’s not logical; it’s psychological. A paradigm shift takes place when someone finally “sees” reality/facts in another way.
Paradigms are inseparable from character. Being is seeing in the human dimension. And what we see is highly interrelated to what we are. We can’t go very far to change our seeing without simultaneously changing our being and vice versa.
The Principle-Centred Paradigm
The Character Ethic is based on the fundamental idea that there are principles that govern human effectiveness – natural laws in the human dimension that are just as real, just as unchanging and unarguably “there”, in the same way as laws such as gravity are in the physical dimension.
Principles are like lighthouses. They are natural laws that cannot be broken. “Objective reality” is composed of “lighthouse” principles that govern human growth and happiness – natural laws that are woven into the fabric of every civilized society throughout history and comprise the roots of every family and institution that has endured and prospered.
The degree to which people in a society recognise and live in harmony with them, moves them toward either survival and stability or disintegration and destruction.
According to Covey, the principles that he is referring to are not esoteric, mysterious or “religious” ideas. These principles are a part of almost every major enduring religion as well as enduring social philosophies and ethical systems. They are self-evident and can easily be validated by any individual. It’s almost as if these principles or natural laws are part of the human condition, part of human consciousness, part of the human conscience. They seem to exist in all human beings, regardless of social conditioning and loyalty to them, even though they might be submerged or numbed by such conditions or disloyalty.
Some of the examples of principles referred to by Covey include fairness, out of which the concept of equity and justice is developed, integrity and honesty which create the foundation of trust, human dignity, service, quality or excellence, potential, growth (releasing potential) and developing talents, patience, nurturance and encouragement.
Principles are deep, fundamental truths that have universal application. They apply to individuals, marriages, families and organisations. When these truths are internalized into habits, they empower people to create a wide variety of practices to deal with different situations.
Principles are guidelines for human conduct that are proven to have enduring, permanent value. They’re fundamental. They’re essentially unarguable, because they are self-evident. One way to quickly grasp the self-evident nature of principles is to simply consider the absurdity of attempting to live an effective life based on their opposites. I doubt that anyone would seriously consider unfairness, deceit, baseness, uselessness, mediocrity, or degeneration to be a solid foundation for lasting happiness and success. Although people may argue about how these principles are defined or manifested or achieved, there seems to be innate consciousness and awareness that they exist.
The more closely our paradigms are aligned with these principles or natural laws, the more accurate and functional they will be. Correct paradigms will infinitely impact our personal and interpersonal effectiveness far more than any amount of effort expended on changing our attitudes and behaviours.
Principles of Growth and Change
The glitter of the Personality Ethic, the massive appeal, is that there is some quick and easy way to achieve quality of life – personal effectiveness and rich, deep relationships with other people – without going through the natural process of work and growth that makes it possible.
It’s a symbol without substance. It’s the “get rich quick” scheme, promising “wealth without work.” And it might even appear to succeed – but the schemer remains.
The Personality Ethic is illusionary and deceptive. And trying to get high quality results with its techniques and quick fixes is just about as effective as trying to get to some place in Chicago using a map of Detroit.
Covey refers to the words of Erich Fromm, an astute observer of the roots and fruits of the Personality Ethic:
“Today we come across an individual who behaves like an automaton, who does not know or understand himself, and the only person that he knows is the person that he is supposed to be, whose meaningless chatter has replaced communicative speech, whose synthetic smile has replaced genuine laughter, and whose sense of dull despair has taken the place of genuine pain. The statements may be said concerning this individual. One is that he suffers from defects of spontaneity and individuality which may seem to be incurable. At the same time, it may be said of him that he does not differ essentially from the millions of the rest of us who walk upon this earth.”
In all of life there are sequential stages of growth and development. A child learns to turn over, to sit up, to crawl, and then to walk and run. Each step is important and each one takes time. No step can be skipped. This is true in all phases of life and in all areas of development. The principle of process also applies in emotional areas, in human relations, and even in the area of personal character. It is unrealistic to try to shortcut a natural process in our growth and development. On a ten-point scale, if I am at level 2 in any field, and desire to move to level 5, I must first take the step toward level three. “A thousand-mile journey begins with the first step” and can only be taken one step at a time.
To relate effectively with other people, we must learn to listen. And this requires emotional strength. Listening involves patience, openness and the desire to understand – highly developed qualities of character. It’s so much easier to operate from a low emotional level and to give high-level advice.
Our level of development is fairly obvious with say tennis or piano playing, where it is impossible to pretend. But it is not so obvious in the areas of character and emotional development. We can pose and put on for a stranger. We can pretend. And for a while we can get by with it – at least in public. We might even deceive ourselves. Yet, I believe that most of us know the truth of what we really are inside; and think many of those we live with and work with do as well.
A New Level of Thinking
Albert Einstein observed, “The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.”
As we look around us and within us and recognise the problems created as we live and interact within the Personality Ethic, we begin to realise that these are deep, fundamental problems that cannot be solved on the superficial level of thinking on which they were created.
We need a new level, a deeper level of thinking – a paradigm based on the principles that accurately describe the territory of effective human being and interacting – to solve these deep concerns.
This new level of thinking is what Seven Habits of Highly Effective People is about. It’s a principle-centred, character-based, “inside-out” approach to personal and interpersonal effectiveness.
“Inside-out” means to start first with self; even more fundamentally, to start with the most inside part of self – with your paradigms, your character, and your motives.
An example of changing from the inside-out is “if you want to be trusted, be trustworthy”.
The inside-out approach says that private victories precede public victories, that making and keeping promises to ourselves, precedes making and keeping promises to others. It says it is futile to put personality ahead of character, to try to improve relationships with others before improving ourselves.
Inside-out is a process – a continuing process of renewal based on the natural laws that govern human growth and progress. It’s an upward spiral of growth that leads to progressively higher forms of responsible independence and effective interdependence.
Covey says “I have never seen lasting solutions to problems, lasting happiness and success, that came from the outside-in. What I have seen result from the outside-in paradigm, is unhappy people who feel victimized and immobilized, who focus on the weaknesses of other people and the circumstances they feel are responsible for their own stagnant situation.”
The Seven Habits – An Overview
“Habits” defined
Our character, basically, is a composite of our habits. Covey quoted Ralph Waldo Emerson who said: “Sow a thought and you reap an action, sow an act and you reap a habit; sow a habit and you reap a character, sow a character, reap a destiny.”
Covey defined a habit as the intersection of knowledge, skill and desire.
Knowledge is the theoretical paradigm, the what to do and the why. Skill is the how to do. And desire is the motivation, the want to do. In order to make something a habit in our lives, we have to have all three. Creating a habit requires work in all three dimensions.
The Seven Habits are not a set of separate or piecemeal psych-up formulas. In harmony with the natural laws of growth, they provide an incremental, sequential, integrated approach to the development of personal and interpersonal effectiveness. They move us progressively on a Maturity Continuum from dependence to interdependence.
As an interdependent person, I have the opportunity to share myself deeply, meaningfully, with others, and I have access to the vast resources and potential of other human beings. Interdependence is a choice only independent people can make. Dependent people cannot choose to become interdependent. They don’t have the character to do it; they don’t own enough of themselves.
That’s why Habits 1, 2 and 3 deal with self-mastery. They move a person from dependence to interdependence. They are the “Private Victories”, the essence of character growth. Private victories precede public victories. It’s inside-out.
As you become truly independent, you have the foundation for effective interdependence. You have the character base from which you can effectively work on the more personality-orientated “Public Victories” of teamwork, cooperation,, and communication in Habits 4, 5 and 6.
Effectiveness Defined
The Seven Habits are habits of effectiveness. Because they are based on principles, they bring the maximum long-term beneficial results possible. They become the basis of a person’s character, creating an empowering centre of correct maps from which an individual can effectively solve problems, maximise opportunities and continually learn and integrate other principles in an upward spiral of growth. They are also habits of effectiveness, because they are based on a paradigm of effectiveness that is in harmony with a natural law, a principle I call the “P/PC Balance” which can be easily understood by remembering Aesop’s fable of the goose and the golden eggs. The story shows that true effectiveness is a function of what is produced (the golden eggs = P) and the producing asset or capacity to produce (the goose = PC). Effectiveness lies in the balance between production (P) and production capability (PC).
What You can Expect
The process involves defining yourself from within, rather than by other people’s opinions or by comparison to others.
You don’t have to be defined by your current habits. You can replace old patterns of self-feating behaviour with new patterns, new habits of effectiveness, happiness, and trust-based relationships. Be patient with yourself. Self-growth is tender; it’s holy ground. There’s no greater investment.
It’s obviously not a quick fix. In the words of Thomas Paine, “That which we obtain too easily, we esteem too lightly. It is dearness only which gives everything its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price on its goods.”
Habit 1: Be Proactive
The importance of “self-awareness” is stressed, i.e. the ability to think about your very thought process. Self-awareness enables us to stand apart and examine even the way we “see” ourselves – our self-paradigm, the most fundamental paradigm of effectiveness. It affects not only our attitudes and behaviours, but also how we see other people. It becomes our map of the basic nature of mankind.
In fact, until we take how we see ourselves (and how we see others) into account, we will be unable to understand how others see and feel about themselves and their world. Unaware, we will project our intentions on their behaviour and call ourselves objective.
If the only vision we have of ourselves comes from the social mirror, i.e. from the current social paradigm and from the opinions, perceptions, and paradigms of the people around us, then our view of ourselves is like the reflection in the crazy mirror room at the carnival. Covey refers to Victor Frankl who used self-awareness to discover the basic principle about the nature of man: Between stimulus and response, man has the freedom to choose. In addition to self-awareness, we have imagination – the ability to create in our minds beyond our present reality. We have conscience – a deep inner awareness of right and wrong, of the principles that govern our behaviour, and a sense of the degree to which our thoughts and actions are in harmony with them. And we have independent will – the ability to act on our self-awareness, free of all other influences. Through our freedom to choose, we have the power to develop and fulfil our human potential.
“Proactivity” Defined
Proactivity means taking initiative. We as human beings are responsible for our own lives. Our behaviour is a function of our decisions, not our circumstances. We have the responsibility to make things happen. Highly proactive people recognise this responsibility. They do not blame circumstances or conditions for their behaviour. Their behaviour is a product of their own conscious choice, based on values, rather than a product of their conditions based on feeling.
Reactive people are often affected by their physical environment. If the weather is good, they feel good. If it isn’t, it affects their attitude and their performance. Proactive people can carry their own weather with them. Whether it rains or shines makes no difference to them. They are value driven, irrespective of the weather.
Reactive people are also affected by their “social weather”. When people treat them well, they feel well; when people don’t, they become defensive or protective. Reactive people build their emotional lives around the behaviour of others, empowering the weaknesses of other people to control them.
The ability to subordinate an impulse to a value is the essence of a proactive person. Reactive people are driven by feelings, by circumstances, by conditions, by their environment. Proactive people are driven by values – carefully thought about, selected and internalized values.
Taking Initiative
Taking initiative means recognizing our responsibility to make things happen.
Many people wait for something to happen or someone to take care of them. But people who end up with good jobs are the proactive ones who are solutions to problems, not problems themselves, who seize the initiative to do whatever is necessary, consistent with correct principles, to get the job done.
Act or Be Acted Upon
It takes initiative to create the P/PC Balance of effectiveness in your life. It takes initiative to develop the Seven Habits. As you study the other six habits, you will see that each depends on the development of your active muscles. Each puts the responsibility on you to act. If you wait to be acted upon, you will be acted upon. And growth and opportunity consequences attend either road.
Listening to Our Language
Because our attitudes and behaviours flow out of our paradigms, if we use our self-awareness to examine them, we can often see in them the nature of our underlying maps. Our language, for example, is a very real indicator of the degree to which we see ourselves as proactive.
The language of reactive people absolves them of responsibility. “That’s me. That’s just the way I am.” There is nothing I can do about it.
“He makes me so mad!” I’m not responsible. My emotional life is governed by something outside my control.
“I have to do it.” Circumstances or other people are forcing me to do what I do. I’m not free to choose my own actions.
That language comes from a basic paradigm of determinism. And the whole spirit of it is the transfer of responsibility. I am not responsible, not able to choose my response.
A serious problem with reactive language is that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. People become reinforced in the paradigm that are determined, and they produce evidence to support the belief. They feel increasingly victimized and out of control, not in charge of their life or their destiny. They blame outside forces – other people, circumstances, even the stars – for their own situation.
In the great literature of all progressive societies, love is a verb. Reactive people make it a feeling. They’re driven by feelings. If our feelings control our actions, it is because we have abdicated our responsibility and empowered them to do so.
Proactive people make love a verb. Love is something you do: the sacrifices you make and the giving of self. Proactive people subordinate feelings to values. Love, the feeling, can be recaptured.
Circle of Concern/Circle of Influence
We all have various things that we are concerned about – our Circle of Concern. Some of the concerns we can do something about (our Circle of Influence) and others we have no real control over (our Circle of Concern).
Proactive people focus their efforts in the Circle of Influence, i.e. the things they can do something about.
Reactive people, on the other hand, focus their efforts on the Circle of Concern. They focus on the problems in the environment and the weakness of other people that they have no control over. Their focus results in blaming and accusing attitudes, reactive language, and increased feelings of victimization which causes their Circle of Influence to shrink.
Direct, Indirect, and No Control
The problems we face, fall in one of three areas: direct control (problems involving our own behaviour); indirect control (problems involving other people’s behaviour); or no control (problems we can do nothing about, such as our past or situational realities).
Direct control problems are solved by working on our habits. Indirect control problems are solved by changing our methods of influence. No control problems involve taking responsibility to change the line on the bottom of our face – to smile, to genuinely and peacefully accept these problems and learn to live with them, even though we don’t like them. The spirit of the Serenity Prayer applies here, commonly quoted as follows: “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.”
There are some people who interpret “proactive” to mean pushy, aggressive, or insensitive; but that isn’t the case at all. Proactive people aren’t pushy. They’re smart, they’re value driven, they read reality and know what’s needed.
Anytime we think the problem is “out there”, that thought is the problem. We empower what’s out there to control us. The change paradigm is “outside-in” – what’s out there has to change before I can change.
Making and Keeping Commitments
At the very heart of the Circle of Influence is our ability to make and keep commitments and promises to ourselves and to others. And our integrity to those commitments, is the essence and clearest manifestation of our proactivity.
It is here that we find two ways to put ourselves in control of our lives immediately. We can make a promise – and keep it. Or we can set a goal – and work to achieve it.
Habit 2: Begin with the End in Mind
What it means to “Begin with the End in Mind”
Consider the words of Joseph Anderson:
“When I look upon the tombs of the great, every emotion of envy dies in me; when I read the epitaphs of the beautiful, every inordinate desire goes out; when I meet with the grief of parents upon a tombstone, my heart melts with compassion; when I see the tombs of the parents themselves, I consider the vanity of grieving for those whom we must quickly follow; when I see kings lying by those who deposed them, when I consider rival wits placed side by side, or the men that divided the world with their contests and disputes, I reflect with sorrow and astonishment on the little competitions, factions, and debates of mankind. When I read the several dates of the tombs, of some that died yesterday, and some six hundred years ago, I consider that great Day when we shall all of us be contemporaries, and make our appearance together.”
The most fundamental application of “begin with the end in mind”, is to begin with the paradigm of the end of your life as your frame of reference or criterion by which everything else is examined. This enables one to evaluate what really matters most to you so that each day of your life contributes in a meaningful way to the vision you have of your life as a whole.
To begin with the end in mind, means to start with a clear understanding of your destination so that the steps you take today are always in the right direction.
People often find themselves achieving victories that are empty, successes that have come at the expense of things that they suddenly realise were far more valuable to them.
If you carefully consider what you wanted to be said of you in the funeral experience, you will find yourdefinition of success.
All Things are Created Twice
All things are created twice. There’s a mental or first creation, and a physical or second creation to all things. The carpenter’s rule is “measure twice, cut once.” Ensure that the blueprint, the first creation, is really what you want and then thereafter, each day’s decisions and actions must be carefully planned and executed in line with the end that you have in mind. This principle should ideally be applied to all facets of your life. In this way, we act within and enlarge the borders of our Circle of Influence.
By Design or Default
The unique human capacities of self-awareness and conscience enable us to examine first creations and make it possible for us to take charge of our own first creation, to write our own script. Put another way, Habit 1 says “You are the creator”. Habit 2 is the first creation.
Leadership and Management – The Two Creations
Habit 2 is based on principles of personal leadership, which means leadership is the first creation. Leadership is not management. Management is the second creation which is discussed in Habit 3. In the words of Peter Drucker and Warren Bennis, “Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.” Management is efficiency in climbing the ladder of success; leadership determines whether the ladder is leaning against the right wall.
Real success is success with self. It’s not having things, but in having mastery, having victory over self. To begin with the end in mind means to approach my role as a parent, as well as my other roles in life, with my values and directions clear. It also means to begin each day with those values firmly in mind. Then as the vicissitudes and challenges come, I can make my decisions based on those values. I can act with integrity. I don’t have to react to the emotion or the circumstance. I can be truly proactive and value driven, because my values are clear.
A Personal Mission Statement
The most effective way to I know to begin with the end in mind is to develop a written personal mission statement or philosophy or creed. The content and form of it will be different for everyone.
At the Centre
In order to write a personal mission statement, we must begin at the very centre of our Circle of Influence, i.e. the centre that comprises our most basic paradigms, the lens through which we see the world.
Whatever is the centre of our life will be the source of our security, guidance, wisdom and power.
Security represents your sense of worth, your identity, your emotional anchorage, your self-esteem, your basic personal strength or lack of it.
Guidance means your source of direction in life, i.e. your internal frame of reference that interprets for you what is happening out there, are standards or principles or implicit criteria that govern moment-by-moment decision-making and actions.
Wisdom is your perspective on life, your sense of balance, your understanding of how the various parts and principles apply and relate to each other. It embraces judgement, discernment and comprehension.
Power is the faculty or capacity to act, the strength and potency to accomplish something. It is the vital energy to make choices and decisions. It includes the capacity to overcome deeply embedded habits and to cultivate higher, more effective ones.
Examples of typical centres of security include spouse, family, money, work, possessions, pleasure, friends, enemies, church and self. Most people fluctuate from one centre to another. The resulting relativism is like roller coasting through life. The ideal is to create one clear centre from which you can consistently derive a high degree of security, guidance, wisdom, and power, empowering your proactivity and giving congruency and harmony to every part of your life.
A Principle Centre
Principle centred security comes from knowing that correct principles do not change and can be depended upon, unlike other centres based on people or things which are subject to frequent and immediate change. We can depend on correct principles.
Principles are deep, fundamental truths, classic truths, generic common denominators. Principles are bigger than people or circumstances, and thousands of years of history have seen them triumph, time and time again.
The wisdom and guidance that accompany principle-centred living come from correct maps from the way things really are, have been and will be. Correct maps enable us to clearly see where we want to go and how to get there.
The personal power that comes from principle-centred living is the power of a proactive individual, unrestricted by the attitudes, behaviours, and actions of others or by circumstances and environmental influences that limit other people.
Principles always have natural consequences attached to them. There are positive consequences when we live in harmony with the principles. There are negative consequences when we ignore them.
Using Your Whole Brain
We should use the left as well as the right side of our brain. The left hemisphere is the more logical/verbal one and the right hemisphere is the more intuitive, creative one. Imagination and conscience which are primarily functions of the right brain enable us to practice Habit 2.
One side or the other generally tends to be dominant in every individual. The ideal of course, would be to cultivate and develop the ability to have good crossover between both sides of the brain.
Personal leadership is not a singular experience. It doesn’t begin and end with the writing of a personal mission statement. It is rather the ongoing process of keeping your vision and values before you, and aligning your life to be congruent with those most important things.
Habit 3: Put First Things First
Habit 3 is the second creation, the physical creation. It’s the fulfilment, the actualisation, the natural emergence of Habits 1 and 2. It’s the exercise of independent will toward becoming principle-centred. It’s the day-in, day-out, moment-by-moment doing it.
The Power of Independent Will
Effective management is putting first things first. While leadership decides what “first things are”, it is management that puts them first, day-by-day, moment-by-moment. Management is discipline carrying it out.
If you are an effective manager of yourself, your discipline comes from within; it is a function of your independent will. You have the will, the integrity, to subordinate your feelings, your impulses, your moods to those values.
Covey refers to E.M. Gray who wrote an essay entitled “The Common Denominator of Success”. Gray spent his life searching for the one denominator that all successful people share. He found that it wasn’t hard work, good luck, or astute human relations, though those were all important. The one factor that seemed to transcend all the rest, embodies the essence of Habit 3, i.e. putting first things first. Gray wrote, “The successful person has the habit of doing the things failures don’t like to do. They don’t like doing them either necessarily. But their disliking is subordinated to the strength of their purpose.”
That subordination requires a purpose, a mission, a Habit 2 clear sense of direction and value, a burning “yes!” inside, that makes it possible to say “no” to other things. It also requires independent will, the power to do something when you don’t want to do it, to be a function of your values rather than a function of the impulse or desire of any given moment. It’s the power to act with integrity to your proactive first creation.
Fourth Generation of (Time) Self – Management
The principle that people are more important than things is recognised. It also recognises that that the first person you need to consider in terms of effectiveness rather than efficiency is yourself. It encourages you to spend time in Quadrant II (i.e. Important, but not urgent activities in, e.g. prevention, PC activities, relationship building, recognising new opportunities, planning and recreation) and to understand and centre your life on principles, to give clear expression to the purposes and values you want to direct your daily decisions. It empowers you to use self-awareness, and your conscience to maintain integrity to the principles and purposes you have determined are most important. Instead of using a road map, you’re using a compass.
Characteristics of Fourth Generation of Self-Management are: it’s principled, it’s conscience directed, it defines your unique mission, including values and long-term goals, it helps you balance your life by identifying roles, and by setting goals and scheduling activities in each key role every week and it gives greater context through weekly organising. The primary focus is on relationships and results, with a secondary focus on time.
Every of the key to effective management of self and others is intrinsic, i.e. it is in the Quadrant II paradigm that empowers you to see through the lens of importance rather than urgency.
Every one of the Seven Habits is in Quadrant II. Everyone deals with fundamentally important things that, if done on a regular basis, would make a tremendous positive difference in our lives.
Paradigms of Interdependence
Covey says that before moving into the area of Public Victory, we should remember that effective interdependence can only be built on a foundation of true independence. Private victory precedes Public Victory. Algebra comes before calculus.
There are no shortcuts. You can’t jump into effective relationships without the maturity, the strength of character, to maintain it. You can’t be successful with other people if you haven’t paid the price of success with yourself.
The place to begin building any relationship is inside ourselves, inside our Circle of Influence, our own character. We have to make this fundamental paradigm shift first. Self-mastery and self-discipline are the foundation of good relationships with others. Real self-respect comes from dominion over self, from true independence. And that’s the focus of Habits 1, 2 and 3. Independence is an achievement. Interdependence is a choice only independent people can make.
As we become independent – proactive, centred in correct principles, value driven and able to organise execute around the priorities in our life with integrity, we then can choose to become interdependent – capable of building rich, enduring, highly productive relationships with other people.
The Emotional Bank Account
An Emotional Bank Account is a metaphor that describes the amount of trust that one’s built up in a relationship. It’s the feeling of safeness you have built up in a relationship.
If I make deposits into an Emotional Bank Account with you through courtesy, kindness, honesty, and keeping my commitments to you, I build up a reserve. Your trust toward me becomes higher, and I can call upon that trust many times if I need to. When a trust account is high, communication is easy, instant, and effective.
But if I have a habit of showing discourtesy, disrespect, cutting you off, overreacting, ignoring you, becoming arbitrary, betraying your trust, threatening you, or playing a little tin god in your life, eventually my Emotional Bank Account is overdrawn and the trust level gets very low.
Our most constant relationships, like marriage, require our most constant deposits.
Six Major Deposits
Understanding the Individual
Attending to the Little Things
Keeping Commitments
Clarifying Expectations
Showing Personal Integrity
Integrity includes, but goes beyond honesty. Honesty is telling the truth – in other words, conforming our words to reality. Integrity is conforming reality to our words – keeping promises and fulfilling expectations. This requires an integrated character, a oneness, primarily with self, but also with life.
One of the most important ways to manifest integrity is to be loyal to those who are NOT present. When you defend those who are absent, you retain the trust of those present.
Apologizing Sincerely When You Make a Withdrawal
The Habits of Interdependence
With the paradigm of the Emotional Bank Account in mind, we’re ready to move into the habits of Public Victory (i.e. Habits 4 to 6), of success in working with other people.
Habit 4: Think Win/Win
Six Paradigms of Human Interaction
Covey explains that there are six paradigms of human interaction:
Win/Win: Both people win. Win/Win is a total philosophy of human interaction. Agreements or solutions are mutually beneficial and mutually satisfying to all parties.
Win/Lose: “If I win, you lose.” Win/Lose people are prone to use position, power, credentials, and personality to get their way.
Lose/Win: “I lose, you win.” Lose/Win people are quick to please and appease, and seek strength from popularity or acceptance.
Lose/Lose: Both people lose. When two Win/Lose people get together, i.e. when two, determined, stubborn, ego-invested individuals interact, the result will be Lose/Lose.
Win: People with the Win mentality don’t necessarily want someone else to lose – that’s irrelevant. What matters is that they get what they want.
Win/Win or No Deal: If you can’t reach an agreement that is mutually beneficial, there is no deal.
Which Option Is Best (the most effective)?
The answer is “It depends.” Most situations, in fact, are part of an interdependent reality, and then Win/Win is really the only viable alternative. There are however instances where one of the other five options (i.e. excluding Win/Win or No Deal), would be preferable, e.g. if you value a relationship and the issue isn’t really that important, you may, in some circumstances, want to go for Lose/Win to genuinely affirm the importance of your relationship with the other person.
The Win/Win or No Deal option is important to use as a back-up. When we have No Deal as an option in our mind, it liberates us from needing to manipulate people and push our own agenda. We can be open and really try to understand the underlying issues
Think Win/Win is the habit of interpersonal leadership. It involves self-awareness, imagination, conscience, and independent will in our relationships with others. It involves mutual learning, mutual influence, mutual benefits.
It takes great courage as well as consideration to create these mutual benefits, particularly when you are interacting with others who are deeply scripted in Win/Lose.
Habit 5: Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood
Covey says that communication is the most important skill in life and Empathic Listening is a key part of communication.
Empathic Listening
“Seek first too understand” involves a very deep paradigm. We typically seek first to be understood. Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply. They’re either speaking or preparing to speak. When the other person is speaking, we tend to either ignore the person, pretending to be listening, listening selectively and even practice attentive listening to the words that are spoken. But very few of us practice the fifth level, the highest form of listening, i.e. empathic listening which is listening with the intent to understand. This means truly seeking first to understand, to really understand. It’s an entirely different paradigm. Empathy is not sympathy.
Empathic Listening is to listen with your ears, eyes and heart. You listen for feeling, for meaning. You listen for behaviour. You use your right brain as well as your left. You sense, you intuit, you feel. Empathic Listening is the key to making deposits in Emotional Bank Accounts.
Diagnose Before You Prescribe
Seek first to understand, or diagnose before you prescribe, is the correct principle in many areas of life.
Then Seek to be Understood
Knowing how to be understood, is the other half of Habit 5, and is equally critical in reaching Win/Win solutions.
Seeking to understand requires consideration; seeking to be understood takes courage. Win/Win requires a high degree of both. So it becomes important in interdependent situations for us to be understood.
The words ethos, pathos and logos contain the essence of seeking first to understand and making effective presentations.
Ethos is your personal credibility, the faith people have in your integrity and competency. Pathos is the empathic side – it’s the feeling. Logos is the logic, the reasoning part of the presentation. Most people in making presentations go straight to the logos, the left brain logic of their ideas, without taking ethos and pathos into consideration.
One should ideally ensure and demonstrate that you deeply understand what the objectives, paradigms, preferences and concerns of your audience are about the topic of the presentation.
Habit 5 lifts you to greater accuracy and integrity in your presentations.
Habit 6: Synergise
Simply defined, synergy means that the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Synergy is the essence of principle-centred leadership. The exercise of all of the other habits, prepares us for the habit of synergy.
When you communicate synergistically, you are simply opening your mind and heart and expressions to new possibilities, new alternatives, new options. Almost all creative endeavours are somewhat unpredictable. Unless people have a high tolerance for ambiguity and get their security from integrity, principles and inner values, they find it unnerving and unpleasant to be involved in in highly creative enterprises. Their need for structure, certainty, and predictability is too high.
Synergy and Communication
Synergy is exciting. Creativity is exciting. It’s phenomenal what openness and communication can produce. The possibilities of truly significant gain, of significant improvement are so real that it’s worth the risk such openness entails. High levels trust and cooperation play a key role in effective synergistic (Win/Win) communication. Respectful communication normally leads to outcomes based on compromise which means that 1 + 1 = 1,5. Both give and take. Respectful communication isn’t defensive or protective or angry or manipulative; it is honest and genuine and respectful. But it isn’t creative or synergistic. It produces a low form of Win/Win.
Synergy means that 1 + 1 = 8, 16, or even 1 600. The synergistic position of high trust produces solutions better than any originally proposed, and all parties know it.
There are some circumstances in which synergy may not be achievable and No Deal isn’t viable. But even in these circumstances, the spirit of sincere trying will usually result in a more effective compromise.
Valuing the Differences
Valuing the differences is the essence of synergy – the mental, the emotional, the psychological differences between people. And the key to valuing those differences is to realize that all people see the world, not as it is, but as they are. If my paradigm is that I think I see the world as it is, and I am objective, so why would I want to value the differences – why would I bother with someone who is “off track”? If that is my paradigm, then I will never be effectively interdependent, or even effectively independent, for that matter. I will be limited by the paradigms of my own conditioning.
The person who is truly effective, has the humility and reverence to recognize his own personal limitations and to appreciate the rich resources available through interaction with the hearts and minds of other human beings. That person values the differences, because those differences add to his knowledge, to his understanding of reality. When we’re left to our own experiences, we constantly suffer from a shortage of data.
When you introduce synergy, you use the motive of Habit 4, the skill of Habit 5, and the interaction of Habit 6 to work directly on the restraining forces. You create an atmosphere in which it is safe to talk about these forces. You unfreeze them, loosen them up, and create new insights. You involve people in the problem in such a way that they tend to become an important part of the solution.
Synergy works; it’s a correct principle. It is the crowning achievement of all the previous habits. It is effectiveness in an interdependent reality – it is teamwork, team building, the development of unity and creativity with other human beings.
Habit 7: Sharpen the Saw – Principles of Balanced Renewal
Habit 7 is taking time to sharpen the saw. It surrounds the other habits on the Seven Habits paradigm, because it is the habit that makes the others possible.
Four Dimensions of Renewal
Habit 7 is personal Production Capacity (PC). It’s renewing the four dimensions of your nature – physical, spiritual, mental, and social/emotional. All four dimensions of our nature have to be exercised regularly and consistently in wise and balanced ways. To do this, we must be proactive. Taking time to sharpen the saw is a definite Quadrant II activity and must be acted upon.
This is the single most important investment we can ever make in life – investment in ourselves. To be effective, we need to regularly sharpen the saw in all of the four dimensions.
The Physical Dimension
The Physical Dimension involves caring effectively for our physical body – eating the right kinds of foods, getting sufficient rest and relaxation, and exercise on a regular basis.
The Spiritual Dimension
Renewing the spiritual dimension provides leadership to your life. It’s highly related to Habit 2.
The spiritual dimension is your core, your centre, your commitment to your value system. It’s a very private area of life and a supremely important one. It draws upon sources that inspire and uplift you. To the timeless truths of all humanity. And people do it very, very differently.
Covey says that he finds renewal in daily prayerful meditation on the scriptures, because they represent his value system. As he read and meditates, he feels renewed, strengthened, centred and recommitted to serve.
Spiritual renewal takes investment of time. But it’s a Quadrant II activity we don’t really have time to neglect.
The great Matin Luther is quoted as saying, “I have so much to do today, I’ll need to spend another hour on my knees.” To him, prayer was not a mechanical duty, but rather a source of power in releasing and multiplying his energies.
David O. McKay taught, “The greatest battles of life are fought out daily in silent chambers of the soul.” If you win battles there, if you settle the issues that inwardly conflict, you feel a sense of peace, a sense of knowing what you are about. And you’ll find that the public victories – where you tend to think cooperatively, to promote the welfare and good of other people, and to be genuinely happy for other people’s successes – will follow naturally.
The Mental Dimension
Covey says that most of our mental development and study discipline comes through formal education. But as soon as we leave the external discipline of school, many of us let our minds atrophy. We don’t do any more serious reading, we don’t explore new subjects in any real depth outside our action fields, we don’t think analytically, we don’t write – at least not critically or in a way that tests our ability to express ourselves in distilled, clear, and concise language. Instead, we spend our time watching TV.
Continuing surveys indicate that television is on in most homes some 35 to 45 hours a week. That’s as much time as many people put into their jobs, more than most put into school. It’s the most powerful socializing influence there is. And when we watch, we’re subject to all the values that are being taught through it. That can powerfully influence us in very subtle and imperceptible ways.
Wisdom in watching television requires the effective self-management of Habit 3, which enable you to discriminate and to select the informing, inspiring, and entertaining programmes which best serve and express your purpose and values.
Continuing education, continually honing and expanding the mind – is vital mental renewal. Proactive people can figure out many, many ways to educate themselves.
It is said that wars are won in the general’s tent. Covey states that sharpening the saw in the first three dimensions – the physical, the spiritual, and the mental – is a practice I call the “Daily Private Victory.” And I commend to you the simple practice of spending one hour a day every day doing it – one hour a day for the rest of your life. Doing so, will affect every decision, every relationship. It will build the long-term physical, spiritual, and mental strength to enable you to handle difficult challenges in life. In the words of Phillips Brooks, who was an American Episcopal clergyman and author: “Some day, in years to come, you will be wrestling with great temptation, or trembling under the great sorrow of your life. But real struggle is here, now …. Now it is being decided whether, in the day of your supreme sorrow or temptation, you shall miserably fail or gloriously conquer. Character cannot be made except by steady, long-continued process.”
The Social Emotional Dimension
While the physical, spiritual, and mental dimensions are closely related to Habits 1, 2 and 3, – centred on the principles of personal vision, and personal leadership and management, the social/emotional dimension focuses on Habits 4, 5 and 6, i.e. centred on the principles of interpersonal leadership, empathetic communication, and creative cooperation.
The social and emotional dimensions of our lives are tied together, because our emotional life is primarily, but not exclusively, developed out of and manifested in our relationships with others.
Renewing our social/emotional dimension does not take time in the same sense that renewing the other dimensions does. We can do it in our normal everyday interactions with other people. But it definitely requires exercise. We may have to push ourselves, because many of us have not achieved the level of Private Victory necessary for Habits 4, 5 and 6 to come naturally to us in all our interactions.
Success in Habits 4, 5 and 6 is not primarily a matter of intellect; it’s primarily a matter of emotion. It’s highly related to our sense of personal security.
Where does intrinsic personal security come from? It doesn’t come from what other people think of us or how they treat us. It doesn’t come from the scripts they’ve handed us. It doesn’t come from our circumstances or our position.
It comes from within. It comes from accurate paradigms and correct principles deep down in our mind and heart. It comes from inside-out congruence, from living a life of integrity in which our daily habits reflect our deepest values.
I believe that a life of integrity is the most fundamental source of personal worth. I do not agree with the popular success literature that says that self-esteem is primarily a matter of mindset, of attitude – that you can psych yourself into peace of mind.
Peace of mind comes when your life is in harmony with true principles and values and in no other way.
There is also the intrinsic security that comes as a result of effective interdependent living. There is security in knowing that Win/Win solutions do exist, that life is not always “either/or”, that there are almost always mutually beneficial Third Alternatives. There is security in knowing that you can step out of your own frame of reference without giving it up, that you can really, deeply understand another human being. There is security that comes when you authentically, creatively and cooperatively interact with other people and really experience these interdependent habits.
There is intrinsic security that comes from service, from helping other people in a meaningful way. One important source is your work, when you see yourself in a contributive and creative mode, really making a difference. Another source is anonymous service – no one knows it and no one necessarily ever will. And that’s not the concern; the concern is blessing the lives of other people. Influence, not recognition, becomes the motive.
The late Dr. Hans Seyle, in his monumental research on stress, basically says that a long, healthy, and happy life is the result of making contributions, of having meaningful projects that are personally exciting and contribute and bless the lives of others. His ethic was “earn your neighbour’s love.”
In the words of George Bernard Shaw, “This is the true joy in life, being used for a purpose recognized by yourself as a mighty one. Being a force of nature instead of a feverish, selfish little clod of ailments and grievances, complaining that the world will not devote itself to making you happy. I am of the opinion that my life belongs to the whole community and as long as I live, it is my privilege to do for it what I can. I want to be thoroughly used up when I die, for the harder I work, the more I live. I rejoice in life for its own sake. Life is no brief candle to me. It is a sort of splendid torch which I have got hold of for the moment and I want to make it burn as brightly as possible before handing it on to future generations.”
Balance in Renewal
The self-renewal process must include balanced renewal in all four dimensions of our nature: the physical, the spiritual, the mental, and the social/emotional.
Synergy in Renewal
Balanced renewal is optimally synergetic. The things you do to sharpen the saw in one dimension have positive impact in other dimensions, because they are so highly interrelated. Your physical health affects your mental health; your spiritual strength affects your social/emotional strength. As you improve in one dimension, you increase your ability in other dimensions as well. The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People create optimum synergy among these dimensions.
The Upward Spiral
Renewal is the principle – and the process – that empowers us to move on an upward spiral of growth and change, of continuous improvement.
To make meaningful and consistent progress along that spiral, we need to consider our conscience, which senses our congruence or disparity with correct principles and lifts us toward them.
Education of the conscience is vital to the truly proactive, highly effective person. Training and educating the conscience, however, requires even greater concentration, more balanced discipline, more consistently honest living. It requires regular feasting on inspiring literature, thinking noble thoughts and, above all, living in harmony with its voice.
Just as junk food and lack of exercise can ruin an athlete’s condition, those things that are obscene, crude, or pornographic can breed an inner darkness that numbs our higher sensibilities and substitutes the social conscience of “Will I be found out?” for the natural or divine conscience of “What is right and wrong?” In the words of Doug Hammarskjold, “You cannot play with the animal in you without becoming wholly animal, play with falsehood without forfeiting your right to truth, play with cruelty without losing your sensitivity of mind. He who wants to keep his garden tidy doesn’t reserve a plot for weeds.”
Once we are self-aware, we must choose purposes and principles to live by; otherwise the vacuum will be filled, and we will lose our self-awareness and become like grovelling animals who live primarily for survival and propagation. People who exist at that level aren’t living; they are “being lived.” They are reacting, unaware of the unique endowments that lie dormant and undeveloped within.
And there are no shortcuts in developing them. The law of the harvest governs; we will always reap what we sow, – no more, no less.
I believe that as we grow and develop on this upward spiral, we must show diligence in the process of renewal by educating and obeying our conscience. An increasingly educated conscience will propel us along the path of personal freedom, security, wisdom, and power.
Moving along the upward spiral requires us to learn, commit, and do on increasingly higher planes. We deceive ourselves if we think that any one of these is sufficient. To keep progressing, we must learn, commit, and do – learn commit and do – learn, commit and do again.
Inside-Out Again
“The Lord works from the inside out. The world works from the outside in. The world would take people out of the slums. Christ would take the slums out of people, and then they would take themselves out of the slums.
The world would mould men by changing their environment. Christ changes men, who then change their environment. The world would shape human behavior, but Christ can change human nature.”
Ezra Taft Benson
Change – real change – comes from the inside-out. It doesn’t come from hacking at the leaves of attitude and behaviour with quick fix personality ethic techniques. It comes from striking at the root – the fabric of our thought, the fundamental essential paradigms, which give definition to our character and create the lens through which we see the world.
A Personal Note
Covey said the following:
“As I conclude this book, I would like to share my own personal conviction concerning what I believe to be the source of correct principles. I believe that correct principles are natural laws, and that God, the Creator and Father of us all, is the source of them, and also the source of our conscience. I believe that to the degree people live by this inspired conscience, they will grow to fulfill their natures; to the degree that they do not, they will not rise above the animal plane. I believe that there are parts to human nature that cannot be reached by either legislation or education, but require the power of God to deal with. I believe that as human beings, we cannot perfect ourselves. To the degree to which we align ourselves with correct principles, divine endowments will be released within our nature in enabling us to fulfill the measure of our creation. In the words of Teilhard de Chardin, “We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience.” I personally struggle with much of what I have shared in this book. But the struggle is worthwhile and fulfilling. It gives meaning to my life and enables me to love, to serve, and to try again. 207 Again, T. S. Eliot expresses so beautifully my own personal discovery and conviction: “We must not cease from exploration. And the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we began and to know the place for the first time.”
Menanteau Serfontein – 24 June 2021. Updated 11 January 2022.
The famous opening line of the best seller book entitled “The Road Less Travelled” that was authored by the American Psychiatrist, M. Scott Peck, is “Life is difficult”. Peck explains that the journey of spiritual growth is long, hard and often painful process of change toward a higher level of self-understanding and understanding others.
In a previous 4-Part Series, we described the following four interrelated Tools/Techniques of “Discipline” that Peck proposes to deal with suffering and the means of experiencing the pain of problems constructively:
This is Part 1 of a Three-Part series that covers Peck’s extensive practical understanding, experience, principles and advice about What is Love, What it is Not and What its Role is. It is well worth reading Parts 2 and 3 as well.
Peck states that he makes no distinction between the mind and the spirit, and therefore no distinction between the process of achieving spiritual growth and achieving mental growth. For the avoidance of confusion, my simplified interpretation of Peck’s reference to “spiritual growth” is that it means personal growth of our“inner being”.
Please note that almost all of the content of this Article has been transcribed verbatim from Peck’s Book.
Love Defined
Peck states that love provides the motive, will, driving force and energy for exercising prudent discipline. He defines love as “The will to extend oneself for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s inner spiritual growth.” Love includes self-love as well as love for another. We are incapable of loving another unless we love ourselves, just as we are incapable of teaching our children self-discipline unless we ourselves are self-disciplined. We cannot be a source of strength unless we nurture our own strength.
Peck stresses that the act of extending one’s limits implies effort. Love is not effortless. To the contrary, love is effortful. The desire to love, is not love in itself. Love is as love does.Love is an act of will, i.e. it is both an intention and an action. Will also implies choice. We do not have to love. We choose to love.
Peck says that psychiatric patients are invariably confused about the nature of love.
What Love is Not
“Falling in Love”
“Falling in Love” is not love. According to Peck, “falling in love” is invariably temporary and the feeling of ecstatic lovingness that characterizes the experience of “falling in love” is something that always passes.
The process of “ego boundaries” (ego boundaries is the concept that individuals are able to distinguish between self and not-self. Someone who is said to lack clear ego boundaries blurs the distinction between himself or herself and others by identifying with them too easily and too much)is a process that starts when we are infants and continues through childhood into adolescence and even into adulthood. As infants, the boundaries are our physical limits and into adolescence they become more psychological.
The experience of falling in love allows us to temporarily escape our loneliness. The essence of falling in love is a sudden collapse of a section of an individual’s ego boundaries, permitting one to merge one’s identity with that of another person. We and our beloved are one! Loneliness is no more!
Sooner or later, in response to the problems of daily living, individual will re-asserts itself and the ego boundaries snap back into place and people “fall out of love”. This either means dissolving the relationship or initiating the work of real loving. Real love occurs in a context in which the feeling of love is lacking, i.e. we act lovingly despite the fact that we might not feel loving. Real love is a permanent, self-enlarging experience.Falling in love is not. However, Peck does point out that “falling in love” could in fact be very close to real love and could potentially lead to a lifetime of real love. Although “falling in love” is not love in itself, it is part of the great and mysterious scheme of love.
Peck states that a key thesis of his Book is that true spiritual growth (personal growth of the inner being) can be achieved only through the persistent exercise of real love.
Romantic Love is a Myth
The true acceptance of one’s own and each other’s individuality and separateness is the only foundation upon which a mature marriage can be based and real love can grow. Peck says that most couples in therapy have to be told that they are “too much married”, i.e. too closely coupled and that they need to establish some psychological distance from each other before they can begin to work constructively on their problems.
Dependency is not love
When you require another individual for your survival, you are a parasite on that individual. There is no choice and no freedom involved in such a relationship. It is a matter of necessity rather than love. Love is the free exercise of choice.Two people love each other only when they are quite capable of living without each other but choose to live with each other.
Dependency is the inability to experience wholeness or to function adequately without the certainty that one is being actively cared for by another. Dependency in physically healthy adults is pathological and a manifestation of a mental illness or defect. One whose life is ruled and dictated by dependency needs, suffers from a psychiatric disorder named “passive-dependent personality disorder”. People suffering from this disorder concern themselves with what others can do for them to the exclusion of what they themselves can do.
Peck says that a good marriage can exist only between two strong and independent people. Passive dependency has its genesis in a lack of love. Passive dependent people also lack self-discipline. They are unwilling or unable to delay gratificationof their hunger for attention. They lack a sense of responsibility for themselves. They passively look to others, frequently their own children, as the source of their happiness and fulfilment and therefore when they are not happy or fulfilled, they basically feel that others are responsible. Consequently, they are endlessly angry, because they endlessly feel let down by others.
If you expect another person to make you happy, you’ll be endlessly disappointed. The most common disturbance that passive dependent people manifest beyond their relationship with others, is dependency on drugs and alcohol. Theirs is the “addictive personality”.
Dependency may appear to be love, because it is a force that causes people to fiercely attach themselves to one another. But in reality, it is not love; it is a form of anti-love.It seeks to receive rather than to give. It nourishes “infantilism” (infantilism is the persistence of childish characteristics or behaviour in adult life) rather than growth. It works to trap and constrict rather than to liberate. Ultimately, it destroys rather than builds relationships, and it destroys rather than builds people.
Cathexis without Love (cathexis is the concentration of mental energy on one particular person, idea, or object, especially to an unhealthy degree)
One of the aspects of dependency is that it is unconcerned with spiritual growth. Dependent people are interested in their own nourishment, but no more; they desire filling, they desire to be happy; they don’t desire to grow, nor are they willing to tolerate the unhappiness, the loneliness and suffering involved in growth. Neither do dependent people care about the spiritual growth of the other, the object of their dependency; they care only that the other is there to satisfy them.
Peck says that the person who loves money and power more than anything else, is often not perceived to be a loving person. He’s often a small person, mean and petty. Wealth and power have become for such people ends in themselves rather than means to a spiritual goal. The only true end of love is spiritual growth.
Hobbies are self-nurturing activities. In loving ourselves – that is, nurturing ourselves for the purpose of spiritual growth – we need to provide ourselves with all kinds of things that are not directly spiritual. To nourish the spirit, the body must also be nourished. We need food and shelter. No matter how dedicated we are to spiritual development, we also need rest and relaxation, exercise and distraction. Saints must sleep and even prophets must play. Thus hobbies may be a means through which we love ourselves. We should however realize that if a hobby or sports activity becomes an end in itself, then it becomes a substitute for our spiritual and personal growth.
On the other hand, power and money may be means to a loving goal. A person may, for instance, suffer a career in politics for the primary purpose of utilizing political power for the betterment of society. Or some people may grow their wealth, not for money’s sake, in order to send their children to university or to provide themselves with the freedom and time for study and reflection which are necessary for their own spiritual growth.
There are a large number of women who are capable of “loving” their children only as infants. Such women can be found everywhere. They may be ideal mothers until their children reach the age of two – infinitely tender, joyously breast-feeding, cuddling and playing with their children consistently – until the child begins to assert its own will – to disobey, to whine, to refuse to play, to occasionally reject being cuddled, to attach itself to other people, to move out into the world a little bit on its own – then the mother’s love ceases. She loses interest in the child and perceives it as a nuisance. At the same time she will often feel an almost overpowering need to be pregnant again, to have another infant, another “pet” – and the same cycle is repeated. She then focuses solely on the infant and would even go as far as avidly seeking to baby-sit for the infant children of neighbours, whilst almost totally ignoring the pleas of her older child(dren) for attention. The effect of this experience is usually evidenced as the children grow to adulthood in a depressive and/or passive dependent personality pattern.
This type of love can be likened to the instinctual behaviour of “falling in love”: it is not a genuine form of love in that it is relatively effortless, and it is not totally an act of will or choice; it is not directed toward improvement or spiritual growth; it is close to love in that it is reaching out to others and serves to initiate interpersonal bonds from which real love might begin; but a good deal more is required to develop a healthy, creative marriage and raise a healthy or spiritually growing child.
The point is that nurturing can be and usually should be much more than simple feeding, and that nurturing spiritual growth is an infinitely more complicated process. Peck refers to a mother who would not let her son take the bus to school, but rather drive him to and from school which is a form of nurturing the son did not need (or want) and it ended up retarding rather than furthering the son’s personal growth. Other examples abound: fathers who buy their sons whole roomsful of toys and their daughters whole closetsful of clothes;parents who set no limits and deny no desires.
Love is not simply “giving”; it is “judicious” giving and “judicious” withholding as well. It is judicious praising and judicious criticizing. It is judicious arguing, struggling, confronting, urging, pushing and pulling in addition to comforting. It is leadership. The word “judicious” means requiring judgement and judgement requires much more than instinct; it requires thoughtful and often painful decision-making.
Self-sacrifice
The motives behind injudicious giving and destructive nurturing are many, but such cases invariably have a basic feature in common: the “giver”, under the guise of love, is responding to and meeting his or her own needs without regard to the personal growth needs of the receiver.
Peck mentions an instance where a man reluctantly came to see him, because his wife was suffering from chronic depression and both his sons were receiving psychiatric attention. Despite the fact that his whole family was “ill”, he was initially completely unable to comprehend that he might be playing a role in their illness. The man said that he was concerned about them and doing everything in his power to take care of them and their problems. Analysis of the situation revealed that this man was indeed working himself to the bone to meet the demands of his wife and children. He had given both his sons new cars and paid the insurance on the cars even though he felt the boys should be putting more effort into being self-supporting. Each week he took his wife to the opera or the theatre in the city even though he intensely disliked going to the city and opera bored him to death. Busy though he was on his job, he spent most of his free time at home picking up after his wife and sons, who had a total disregard for house-cleaning. He said that he was tired of doing all this for them all the time, but said “what else am I to do?”. I love them and my concern for them is so great that I will never stand by as long as they have needs to be filled. As it turned out, this man had a heartless father who was an alcoholic and philanderer with no concern for his family and grossly neglected them. Peck’s patient vowed never to be like his father and instead to be seen as loving and compassionate.
What the patient did not understand was the degree to which he wasinfantilizing his family. He continually referred to his wife as his “kitten” and his full-grown strapping sons as my “little ones”. What he had to be taught was that loving was a complicated rather than a simple activity, requiring the participation of his entire being – his head as well as his heart.Because of his need to be as unlike his father as possible, he had not been able to develop a flexible response system for expressing his love. He had to learn that not giving at the right time was more compassionate than giving at the wrong time and that fostering independence was more loving than taking care of people who could otherwise take care of themselves.He even had to learn that expressing his own needs, anger, resentments and expectations was every bit as necessary to the mental health of his family as his self-sacrifice, and therefore that love must be manifested in confrontation as much as in beatific (“blissful”) acceptance.
Gradually coming to realize how he infantilized his family, he began to make changes. He stopped picking up after everyone and became openly angry when his sons did not adequately participate in the care of the home. He refused to continue paying for the insurance of his sons’ cars, telling them that if they wanted to drive, they would have to pay for it themselves. He suggested that his wife goes alone to the opera in New York. In making these changes, he had to risk appearing to be the “bad guy” and had to give up the self-imposed omnipotence of his former role as provider for all the needs of the family. His sons, as well as his wife, initially reacted to these changes with anger. But soon the one son went back to college and the other found a more demanding job and got an apartment for himself. His wife began to enjoy her new independence and to grow in ways of her own. The man himself became more effective in his job and his life became more enjoyable.
Whenever we think of ourselves of doing something for someone else, we are in some way denying our own responsibility. Whatever we do is done because we choose to do it and we make that choice because it is the one that satisfies us the most. When we genuinely love, we do so because we want to love. We do something because it is an extension of ourselves, rather than a sacrifice of the self. Love enlarges rather than diminishes the self; it fills the self rather than depleting it.
Love is not a Feeling
Pecks states that love is an action, an activity. It is not a feeling. A genuinely loving individual will often take loving and constructive action toward a person that he/she consciously dislikes.
Genuine love implies commitment and the exercise of wisdom. When we are concerned for someone else’s spiritual growth, we know that a lack of commitment is likely to be harmful and that the commitment to that person is probably necessary for us to manifest our concern effectively.
In a constructive marriage, the partners must regularly, routinely and predictably attend to each other and their relationship, no matter how they feel. Genuine love transcends the matter of cathexes (cathexis is the concentration of mental energy on one particular person, idea, or object, especially to an unhealthy degree). When genuine love exists, it does so with or without cathexis and with or without a loving feeling. Earlier on, Peck defined love as the will to extend oneself for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth. Genuine love is volitional (an act of will) rather than emotional. The person who truly loves, does so because of a decision to love. This person has made a commitment to be loving whether or not the loving feeling is present. If it is, so much better; but if it isn’t, the commitment to love, the will to love, still stands and is still exercised.
I must choose on whom to focus my capacity to love and toward whom to direct my will to love. True love is not a feeling by which we are overwhelmed. It is a committed, thoughtful decision. The common tendency to confuse love with the feeling of love allows people all manner of self-deception.
People who grossly neglect their children, more often than not, will consider themselves the most loving of parents. Because true love is an act of will that often transcends ephemeral (lasting for a very short time) feelings of love or cathexis, it is correct to say “Love is as love does.”Love and non-love, as good and evil, are objective and not purely subjective phenomena.
Please note that almost all of the content of this Article has been transcribed verbatim from M. Scott Peck’s Book.
This is an article that appeared in the Business Day newspaper on 4 February 2022 written by the economist Brian Kantor. Kantor is head of the research institute at Investec Wealth & Investment. He is Professor Emeritus at the University of Cape Town, where he was the Dean of the Faculty of Commerce and Head of the School of Economics. He is also the former Chief Investment Strategist of Investec Wealth & Investment SA. He writes in his personal capacity.
Cadre deployment is to be expected everywhere. Incoming US administrations do it as a matter of course. But why have so many of the most influential of the South African cadres proved so very fallible, as revealed in gory detail by the Zondo commission?
It is our leaders who set the standard, showing that crime does pay given kickbacks to the right places. Short-term horizons — “if I don’t take advantage, my insider rivals will” — help explain some of the observed behaviour.
There has been no lack of competition for the material opportunities offered in South Africa, which go well beyond what could be regarded as decent salaries and employment benefits. That includes generous rewards for serving on the boards or management teams of the semi-autonomous government bodies responsible for regulating private conduct.
Many are notorious now for providing opportunities for shopping/conference trips abroad and multiple contrived board meetings, for which valuable hourly attendance fees are unnecessarily charged.
The key posts in government departments and agencies turn over rapidly as the direction of the political wind changes, so the paranoia of those in office is not irrational. The large financial gains observed from Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), without any obvious relationship between input and benefits, are a further influence.
That you can become fabulously rich when lucky in your partnerships — obtained through your political connections rather than your observable efforts or skills — and through doing business with the government on highly favourable terms because of these connections, is morally debilitating and sends the message that competence and dedication are not necessarily rewarded, nor essential to get on in life.
Repeat business is the most valuable source of sales and profits for any business. It helps keep owners and workers honest and competitive, striving to enhance valuable reputations for fair dealing. But government departments and agencies have monopoly power, so we need them more than they need us. We wait in line or online patiently, and smile obediently.
We are not customers, but supplicants of government agencies that have great influence over us. Imagine life without a passport, visa, vaccination certificate or driving licence, a decent education or a well-organised casualty ward. We would like to believe public servants are trying as hard as they know how, to please us. Because that is the right, respectful way.
Unconstrained self-interest cannot fully explain what has gone on in South Africa. It calls for analysis by psychologists, philosophers and historians rather than economists. Do we understand the derivation of the values that determine the culture of the workplace? Can we explain how a sense of honour, honesty, patriotism or duty is developed to help set reasonable and realistic expectations of the supplier and user of services of all kinds?
Helpful attitudes and good performance are encouraged by a strong sense of vocation — a sense of a job worth doing well for what are widely recognised as appropriate material rewards that can be well understood and accepted by all parties involved.
How are they cultivated? They are part of the implicit employment contract, or what can be understood more broadly as a social contract. The best standards do not emerge overnight and must be actively cultivated. Ethics have to be taught.
When regimes change and the power structures change radically with them, a strong sense of life-changing opportunities can become overwhelming and corrupting. The large gains achieved by some individuals in South Africa via misgovernment have been highly damaging to the incomes and prospects of the rest of us. It will take acknowledgement and understanding of this to get South Africa back on the path to an agreed, much improved moral order and stronger economy.
It calls for a new social contract, a Zondo-inspired devotion to doing your duty for fair reward and obeying and enforcing laws justly made and deservedly respected. A community of those wanting to give service rather than take unfair advantage of their favoured status must become the new morality.
It is suggested that you read the article on the Website entitled “Men Without Chests” which deals with the importance of educating people about time-tested values and principles.
The citizens of most of the genuine democracies of the world, enjoy certain constitutionally enshrined freedoms and rights. Typical rights include, amongst others, freedom of opinion, freedom of expression (and speech), right to life, freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment, right to liberty and security, respect for your private and family life, freedom of thought, belief and religion and freedom of assembly and association. In most cases these rights and freedoms are not unlimited and not without boundaries and commensurate responsibilities.
Let’s look at the example of “freedom of expression” which gives you the right to hold your own beliefs and opinions and to express them freely (verbally and in writing). Although you have the right to freedom of expression, you also have a duty to behave responsibly and to respect other people’s rights. Public authorities may restrict this right (to freedom of expression) under certain circumstances, provided the restriction is necessary, lawful and proportionate.
A mandated authority has the right (and duty) to restrict your freedom of expression if, for example, you express views that encourage racial or religious hatred.
Article 10 of the European Court of Human Rights states inter alia the following about Freedom of Expression: “The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.”
It is a privilege to have rights of this nature that are constitutionally and/or legally protected. Compare this right to many authoritarian regimes where such rights do not exist and where the expression of opinions that deviate from what citizens are expected to believe, say and do, are ruthlessly suppressed.
Freedom of Expression
Regrettably, in some democracies, where liberal rights to freedom of expression exist, there is a growing number of instances of people exercising their rights inappropriately. Interactions seem to become increasingly polarised, not only in respect of moral and ethical issues, social justice and politics, but even with regard to normal daily issues of life. In many instances, restraint and decorum are abandoned and rights to freedom of expression are abused by using various platforms including speeches, interviews and various other media, especiallysocial media, to maliciously bully, insult, humiliate, ridicule, defame, degrade, threaten and harm others in cruel, insensitive and inhumane ways that in many instances can be classified as a crime.
Sadly, there appears to be a growing trend where many people are dealing with others in ways that display a gross absence of respect and a lack of honouring the dignity of others. This happens not only amongst ordinary people, but also in business, sports and politics (to mention just a few), where people are openly referred to in humiliating and derogatory terms of the worst kind – the substance and merit of someone’s views on a given issue is underplayed and the individual is unfairly attacked and insulted as a person.
There is also a growing tendency to deliberately disseminate untruths, fake news and conspiracy theories about someone or something under the guise of freedom of expression which is unacceptable. (Read: “Conspiracy Theories and Fake News”).
Another noticeable trend is where an individual or an organisation aggressively promotes a particular viewpoint or cause (which they virtually regard as a virtue, even though it isn’t) in terms of their right to freedom of expression. However, if anyone dares to disagree with them, they would “label” the “offender” and do their utmost to besmirch the so-called offender’s name. Many of us are even aware of instances where people with an informed opinion on something based on objectively verifiable evidence, have received death threats, because their viewpoint contradicts the opinions of the person who issued the threat.
The reasons for these tendencies are complex. However, whatever the reasons might be to prompt someone to lower themselves to this level, I find it utterly unnecessary and unacceptable. Such behaviour does not belong in the modern era. We have advanced exponentially in terms of technology, but seem to have regressed to primeval/prehistoric times when it comes to the treatment of our fellow-men.
One of the possible factors that plays a role here could be thegrowing pre-occupation with “ME”and the erroneous impression that “the world revolves around ME”, because “I am so special”. Of course everyone is special in their own unique way, but don’t think that you are more special than the next person.
In my opinion, one of the core causes of this concerning state of affairs, is the fact that people in many societies no longer have a common/shared set of fundamental values, principles, norms and standards about morality and behaviour. In his Book “The Abolition of Man”, C.S. Lewis points out that certain traditional (universal) values (contained in what C.S. Lewis refers to as the “Tao”), have applied in various civilizations over the ages. Lewis rightly maintains that there are specific principles, standards of morality, values and a clear distinction between what is “good and bad” and “right and wrong”, that have universally existed across most religions, faith movements and societies. (Read: “Men Without Chests”.)
It appears that in various parts of the world, the extreme emphasis on individual liberties and rights is out of balance with the “common good” and the needs of society as a whole.
I believe that a growing number of people either don’t know about the time-tested values, principles, norms and standards of traditional humanity, or perhaps they do know about such values and principles, but don’t agree with it.
Whatever the causes might be, I strongly believe that it is not necessary for us to accept the status quo. I believe that individuals and entities at all levels throughout society should be doing substantially more to inculcate sound values and principles across the board.This will help to ensure that people do not end up with world-class knowledge and skills about subject matter, but lacking the knowledge and skills to successfully manage their personal lives.
I agree with Theodore Roosevelt who said: “To educate a person in the mind but not in morals is to educate a menace to society.”
All of us have a role to play to actively guard the essence and true meaning and purpose of the right to freedom of expression within the required boundaries/limits as well as the responsibilities associated with it.
I do realise that the ideal that is proposed here will be extremely difficult to achieve in a large society that is becoming increasingly diverse and heterogeneous,however the option of sitting back and doing nothing would be a dereliction of duty.
It is suggested that you read the article on the Website entitled “Men Without Chests” which deals with the importance of educating people about time-tested values and principles.
You are also encouraged to read the article entitled “Respect, Honour and Dignity” which deals with the concern about the widespread disrespect and lack of dignity that exists in society and how to deal with it.
In the process of exploring the nature and motivations for dishonesty, Dan Ariely, professor of psychology and behavioural economics and author, found himself wondering whether dishonesty might spread from person to person like a social contagion – an “immorality virus”. If people saw someone from their same social group cheating, would it make them more likely to cheat too?
What Ariely uncovered in his experiments, was the insidious social component of dishonesty and the way it can indeed spread like an infection. Ariely theorizes that “in many areas of life, we look to others to learn what behaviours are appropriate and inappropriate.”
Ariely concluded that “dishonesty may very well be one of the cases where the social norms that define acceptable behaviour are not very clear, and the behaviour of others can shape our ideas about what’s right and wrong.” In other words, witnessing someone from our social group being dishonest, can potentially “recalibrate our internal moral compass.”
How to Inoculate Yourself Against the Virus of Moral Decay
Choose your friends and associates wisely. Every man likes to fancy himself as a completely independent lone wolf who is immune to peer pressure. Such autonomy may be a worthy ideal, but research on the subject has shown that – to one degree or another – we are all influenced by those with whom we are surrounded – they can even play a role in shifting the needle of our moral compass as well.
It is most definitely possible to spend your time with those who have far lower moral standards than you and still maintain your own. It’s just more difficult.Swimming upstream gets tiresome, and you run the risk of eventually being worn down and coming to accept the lower standards as your new normal. When you surround yourself with friends who share your high moral standards, however, staying on the straight and narrow becomes much easier.
Know and be firm in your personal moral code. While we all may be influenced by our friends to varying degrees, the firmer and clearer we are about our values, principles and standards, the less swayed we will be by the actions and examples of others.
Have you applied your mind and considered the following questions?
Is your personal moral code vague and squishy, or is it crystal clear and set on a firm foundation?
Have you taken the time to reflect on your values and principles?
Do you know how and why you arrived at embracing them or are they unexamined beliefs that you have absorbed from your upbringing and culture?
Whether you are amongst like-minded people or far afield with those who do not share your values, your personal moral code will act as a constant source of direction so that you act as the same man wherever you go and with whomever you meet.
Stopping the Spread of Contagion in Society
Integrityis not simply a personal virtue, but a social one as well. In fact, there may be no other virtue in which an individual’s personal cultivation of it has such a large effect on society as a whole. The “socialcontagion theory” explains why.
When one individual decides to act in an unethical way, his example can influence someone else to do likewise, resulting in a domino effect that lowers the standards of an ever-widening group of people. Or as Dan Ariely puts it: “Passed from person to person, dishonesty has a slow, creeping, socially erosive effect. As the ‘virus’ mutates and spreads from one person to another, a new, less ethical code of conduct develops. And although it is subtle and gradual, the final outcome can be disastrous. This is the real cost of even minor instances of cheating and the reason weneed to be more vigilant in our efforts to curb even small infractions.”
The virus of dishonesty is not an abstract idea. Think of the corruption that seems to run rampant in government as well as the private sector. It surely started with a few individuals who were willing to let things slide. Those around them saw that this was the new norm and began to adopt the same standards. When new guys came in, they adopted what had by then become the standard culture of the enterprise. Even the “doctors” who promise to come in and clean things up end up infected by the same disease they were supposed to cure. It doesn’t have to be on such a grand scale either.
Ariely further argues that the cheating and dishonesty of public figures has an outsized effect on the overall integrity level of society, as their odious examples get broadcasted to so many people.
What then can we do to throw a wrench in this cycle?
There seems to be an increased “blurring” of what is “right” vs “wrong” and “good” vs “bad” . It appears that the concept of Absolute Truths is no longer fashionable. Instead, relativism is gaining ground, i.e. everything is relative: “what is true for you is not true for me”. Everything is circumstantial – “I will do what is convenient, not what is right”.
I agree with C.S. Lewis (author, lay theologian and academic at both Oxford University and Cambridge University) who said a few decades ago, that the absence of absolute truths, would lead to the decay of morality and a lack of virtue within society. Without a belief in and the teaching of absolute truths inherent in the moral laws of traditional humanity, we fail to educate the heart and are left with intelligent men who behave upon impulse without restraint and filters, or as Lewis puts it, “Men without Chests”.
It could also be as a result of parents, educational institutions and even religious organizations not actively teaching children and adults about absolute truths – what it is, why it is important and how to apply it.
I believe that individuals and entities at all levels throughout society should be doing substantially more to inculcate sound values and principles. This will help to ensure that people do not end up with world-class knowledge and skills about subject matter, but lacking the knowledge and skills to successfully manage their personal lives within the boundaries of sound ethical and moral values and principles.
All of us have a responsibility to use our sphere of influence to persuade people to reject relativism and to embrace and inculcate timeless, absolute godly truths, values and principles in all spheres of society, so that we don’tbecome “men without chests”.
We should publicize and champion stories of people who are doing the right thing. Ariely argues that giving good examples more attention is effective, because morality is contagious in the very same way that dishonesty is: “With more salient and vivid examples of commendable behaviour, we might be able to improve what society views as acceptable and unacceptable behaviours, and ultimately improve our actions.”
We’ve developed an attitude of “see no evil, hear no evil” — that we shouldn’t care what other people are doing and should look the other way, minding our own business. I agree that we should not be hyper-critical and judgemental, i.e. looking for the splinter in my brother’s eye without seeing the plank in my own eye. However, by taking the principle of non-judgementalism too far, we end up turning a blind eye to obvious gross instances of dishonesty and unethical behaviour whereby the spread of the “virus” of moral decay is fuelled even further. In fact, it could be argued that turning a blind eye could in some instances be regarded as aiding and abetting unethical behaviour and thereby playing a part in dishonesty becoming the new normal in society.
We’ve adopted a mindset of tolerance in the name of personal freedom and “non-judgementalism”. Yet the result has been the erection of liberty-reducing external controls in the form of rules and regulations designed to detect dishonesty in the absence of a culture of honour. Such rules and regulations may act as a last defense line of safeguards, but they aren’t truly effective; when people know that they aren’t being watched by others and have no fear of being called out and punished for their actions, they will try to game and take advantage of the system to the greatest extent possible, circumventing the rules whenever they can. Those who don’t cheat (yet) see this and worry that if they don’t start fudging things too, they will be left behind. Soon, more and more people feel that they should embrace a grey zone of morality to get ahead.
Conclusions
There is a popular viewpoint these days that ridicules the idea that one individual’s personal decisions and behaviour could possibly have an effect on the behaviour of others. But what the scientific research on the subject has established, is that each person’s actions have an ever-so-subtle ripple effect that influences others and the culture at large. We cannot see it with our eyes, or in real time, and of course no one is consciously aware of how these ripples are affecting them. No, it all happens at the level of the subconscious. This should surely give us reason to pause and cause us to reflect on our own behaviour. What signals are you and I sending out each day? Are you and I a person whose example is making the world better…or worse?
The Website contains a substantial number of articles and other content of substance.
Many of the Website users would not have had the opportunity to read everything that has been published on the Website thus far.Until 21 January 2022, when we will be resuming weekly new additions, we are putting the spotlight on some of the articles that have been the most popular amongst the readers.